Why the goldstone report matters
By Richard A Falk
(source:Middle East Online)
Richard A. Falk – is an American professor emeritus of international law at Princeton University, author or co-author of 20 books, and an appointee to two United Nations positions on the Palestinian territories.
“So why did the Israeli government boycott the commission? The real answer is quite simple: they knew full well that the commission, any commission, would have to reach the conclusions it did reach.” – Uri Avnery (Israeli peace activist, and former Knesset member), ‘On the Goldstone Report’ 19 Sept 2009.
Richard Goldstone, former judge of South Aftica’s Constitutional Court, the first prosecutor at The Hague on behalf of the International Criminal Court for Former Yugolavia, and anti-apartheid campaigner reports that he was most reluctant to take on the job of chairing the UN fact-finding mission charged with investigating allegations of war crimes committed by Israel and Hamas during the three week Gaza War of last winter.
Goldstone explains that his reluctance was due to the issue being “deeply charged and politically loaded,” and was overcome because he and his fellow commissioners were “professionals committed to an objective, fact-based investigation,” adding that “above all, I accepted because I believe deeply in the rule of law and the laws of war,” as well as the duty to protect civilians to the extent possible in combat zones.