Skip to content

Iran – Breaking News

Response from mercedes benz

  • by

Response from Mercedes-Benz

Dear Mr Vawda

We have been made aware, that during the course of last week individual staff members from our company sent out emails with content of which members of the Islamic community may take offence.

The respective employees acted in a private initiative and illegally abused our company email for this purpose.   Mercedes-Benz South Africa has a zero tolerance policy in this regard and we instantly initiated disciplinary action.

On behalf of Mercedes-Benz South Africa as well as on behalf of Daimler AG in Germany I would like to reiterate our pride in our long successful history and tradition as global multi-cultural and multi-national organisations.   In fact, our diversity has always been an integral and elementary contributor to our success.

I would like to express my deep and sincere regret for this incident and promise that we will do everything possible to ensure, that something like this does not happen again.

Dr Hansgeorg Niefer
President & CEO
Mercedes-Benz South Africa (Pty) Ltd.

Read More »Response from mercedes benz

Israeli drums of war against Iran

  • by

Israeli Drums of War against Iran

Israeli President Shimon Peres’ remarks from the rostrum of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) in the presence of 6,000 persons, among them prominent congressmen, did not surprise us. "Israel will not yield to the Iranian nuclear threat," he said and stressed that "the Middle East is currently living under this threat."

Read More »Israeli drums of war against Iran

Theres no way im going to deploy to Afghanistan

  • by

“There’s No Way I’m Going to Deploy to Afghanistan”
Dahr Jamail

MARFA, Texas — "It’s a matter of what I’m willing to live with," Specialist Victor Agosto of the U.S. Army, who is refusing orders to deploy to Afghanistan, explained to IPS. "I’m not willing to participate in this occupation, knowing it is completely wrong."

Agosto, who returned from a 13-month deployment to Iraq in November 2007, is based at Fort Hood in Killeen, Texas.

While in Iraq, Agosto never left his base, located in northern Iraq.

"I never had any traumatic experiences, never fired my weapon," Agosto told IPS in a phone interview. "I mostly worked in information technology, working on computers and keeping the network functioning well. But it was in Iraq that I turned against the occupations. Through my reading, and watching what was going on, I started to feel very guilty."

Read More »Theres no way im going to deploy to Afghanistan

The nakbah “ the palestinian catastrophe

  • by

THE NAKBAH – THE PALESTINIAN CATASTROPHE

The Arab rebellion (1936 – 1939) quelled, disarmed and impoverished, the Palestinian was left with only his conviction intact – that he would defend his rights.

The hitherto underground British trained army, the Haganah, trained explicitly to put down the Arabs, along with massive supplies, emerged in collusion with their masters, as a formidable force. In addition, the notorious British trained night squads (with Moshe Dayan on its first mission), given a free hand by the authorities, played its role with zeal. Indeed, it was British military doctrines that the Israeli Defense Force adopted on the inception of the Jewish state.

The Arab rebellion had spelt out the Palestinian position: the policy of infiltration had been the core cause of the uprising; the Palestinian would only relinquish his land by force, thus giving clarity to the strategic needs of the settler:

To allow for a Jewish settlement in a small country such as Palestine, it would necessitate the transfer of the Palestinians, one and all, to neighbouring countries.

To this end, The Jewish National Fund, with ingenuity, sought to create districts, with a Jewish majority, as opposed to villages. Thus when the Jewish state was proclaimed, the outline of the districts were automatically included within the boundaries of the Jewish state!

Subsequent to the Arab rebellion, the British decided to revoke its policy, which had proved to be unfeasible. The unrest between Jews and Arabs since 1920, was indeed the result of an incoherent policy. It declared that the Jewish national home had now been established; within five years Jewish immigration and land purchase, with restrictions imposed, would terminate; thereafter independent self-governing institutions would be set up in Palestine.

Loyal to the creed of their bizarre logic, the Zionist turned their fury, with eloquent threats, on the British.

The interlude of World War II (1939 – 1945) brought about a lull in Palestine, at least, in the military arena. Having taken note of the power shift, with meticulous foresight, the Zionists sought to involve the hitherto indifferent, powerful American Jewry to exercise its influence on the White House.

The tacit understanding between Western powers and the Zionists, that in return for Western support for the Zionist cause, a negligible quota of refugees would be admitted by the West, the rest, siphoned off to Palestine, would remain intact, the Zionists assured. It sought only American commitment to Zionist aspirations.

This commitment they found in Harry Truman, the American President. And, by 1945 the American Jewry had secured in excess of $46 million for the Zionist cause.

Moreover, this unshakeable alliance persuaded the ‘civilised world’ to see, for those wretched survivors of the Holocaust, Palestine as their natural saviour.

The war over, the Zionist turned their guns on their masters, calculated to drive them out; the American Jewry applauding all the way; Washington, insidiously approving.

Meanwhile, the wavering UN members succumbed to President Truman’s duress and in addition to the 7% of the country already acquired by way of purchase, the UN instantaneously handed over to the Zionist a staggering 47%; although less than what had been proposed by the settlers, the Zionists were confident in the belief that this division was by no means the final.

Outraged at the dismemberment of their land, the Palestinians refused to recognise the validity of the UN decision and along with volunteers from Arab countries, against overwhelming odds opposed it by force. The outcome was never in doubt.

The gruesome butcher at Deir Yasin on 10 April 1948, (a prelude to other massacres), of 250 children, women and men, led by Menachem Begin, (incidentally a Nobel Peace Prize winner), was part of a calculated strategy, designed to create panic. Indeed, the horrors of Deir Yasin were later to be ruthlessly played on; the fear the massacre had generated, resulted effectively in the mass exodus of almost a million Palestinians to other lands.

The Arabs driven out, the Zionist with ease moved in to occupy their land. On 14 May 1948, the state of Israel was proclaimed.

Having found itself in an untenable position, Great Britain surrendered the mandate to the UN (14 May), making its ignominious exit, followed by a combined Arab force entering Palestine on 15 May 1948. Uncoordinated, ill-equipped, and in intense rivalry (each party eager to secure a negotiated settlement of Palestine), it failed to impress itself on Israel’s secured positions, and, to the chagrin of their Palestinian brothers, the Arab armies were soon on the retreat.

Their fate was sealed, or so it would seem?

Amena Hayat
Cape Town

Read More »The nakbah “ the palestinian catastrophe