Skip to content

Bulldozer terrorism it depends on whos on top and whos underneath

  • by

By Samah Jabr

In a span of less than three weeks, two Palestinians used bulldozers in rampages against cars and people in Jerusalem. In the first incident,  Hussam Duwiyat killed two men and a woman, and injured many, after he rammed a bulldozer into a packed commuter bus on Jaffe Street on July 2. According to reports, Duwiyat was a resident of Arab East Jerusalem and worked at a building site near the scene. His Jewish wife has told the press that he suffers from drug-induced psychosis, but that he has no associations with nationalist or religious organizations.

In the second incident, Ghassan Abu Teir, 23, from the Jerusalem village Umm Touba, went on a rampage in central Jerusalem on July  22 near the King David Hotel, where Sen. Barack Obama was staying during his “election campaign” trip to Israel. Obama’s statement before the annual conference of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) calling for a united Jerusalem has angered Palestinians, especially Jerusalemites. Nevertheless, Abu Teir’s family reports that the incident was an accident, that he lost control of the brakes and was shot only because of the previous bulldozer attack.

Palestinians remember the Israeli truck driver who killed four Palestinian workers in the Gaza Strip in December 1987. That accident—which to this day Palestinians are convinced was intentional—sparked the first intifada.

How Symbolic!

No matter how startling, these recent acts pale in comparison to what Israel has done with its bulldozers.
With each passing day, more of Arab East Jerusalem vanishes as bulldozers clear the land for more Israeli settlements. Since the November 2007 Annapolis conference, which was supposed to revive the peace process, Israel has only accelerated its settlement building, especially in Jerusalem; this despite more than a hundred meetings between Israeli and Palestinian officials holding “peace negotiations.”

Bulldozers also represent the hundreds of Palestinian villages levelled and thousands of homes demolished in Gaza, the West Bank and Jerusalem in Israel’s relentless violation of international law. In 2004 alone Israel flattened 2,243 houses in Gaza and the West Bank, leaving some 14,000 Palestinians homeless. Bulldozing Palestinian homes under the pretext that the owners lacked building permits is common practice in Jerusalem.

Bulldozers also have created massive destruction in the path of Israel’s Separation Wall snaking across occupied Palestine. Their Israeli operators have used them to uproot hundreds of thousands of olive, citrus and other fruit trees, representing the livelihood of Palestinian farmers; destroy hundreds of wells and agricultural storehouses; and tear up roads and block thousands of others with concrete and earthen mounds.

A Cowboy on a Bulldozer

In a shocking account published in the May 31, 2001 edition of Yediot Aharonot, Moshe Nissim, who had been suspended from his job as a senior inspector in the Jerusalem municipality on suspicion of having accepted bribes from contractors and other business owners, recounted his role in the attack on the Jenin refugee camp. Drunk and shirtless, he drove a massive D-9 army bulldozer on an officially sanctioned rampage.

“I didn’t even know how to operate the D-9,” Nissim recalled. “Within two hours, they [Israeli soldiers] taught me to drive forward, and clear a flat surface. I tied the ‘Beitar’ football team flag to the back of the bulldozer and told them: ‘Move away, let me work.’ They knew I had no fear, that I don’t give a damn…

“For 75 hours, with no break, I just erased and erased, I kept drinking whisky to fight off fatigue. Over the loudspeaker, they were told to leave their houses before I destroyed them. But I did not give a chance to anyone. I did not wait. I did not touch the house and wait for them to come out. I would simply give the house a massive blow so that it would collapse as quickly as possible in order to get to other houses. To do a lot.

“I found joy with every house that came down, because I knew they didn’t mind dying, but they cared for their homes. If you knocked down a house, you buried 40 or 50 people for generations. If I am sorry for anything, it is for not tearing the whole camp down.”

Crushed underneath a Bulldozer

A year later, in March 2003, 23-year-old American peace activist Rachel Corrie was crushed to death by an American-made Caterpillar bulldozer as she tried to prevent the Israeli army from destroying the Gaza Strip home of Palestinian pharmacist Samir Nasrallah. International activists who accompanied her claim that the Israeli soldier driving the bulldozer deliberately ran over Corrie twice, advancing and reversing, as she stood unarmed in front of the home.

A Political Bulldozer

“Bulldozer” is also the nickname Israel’s belligerent former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, who left 20,000 deaths in his 1982 march to and siege of Beirut. An Israeli commission of inquiry found then-Defense Minister Sharon indirectly responsible for the massacre at Beirut’s Sabra and Shatila refugee camps.

A decade earlier, as head of the IDF Southern Command, Sharon ordered the bulldozing of hundreds of Palestinian homes in order to carve a wide, straight path for Israeli troops and their heavy armored vehicles to move easily through Gaza’s Beach refugee camp. After throwing everyone’s belongings into the street, Sharon’s troops brought in their bulldozers and began flattening the street, beating and killing anyone who dared protest. That street is now known as Wreckage Street.

In August 1971 alone, soldiers under Sharon’s command destroyed some 2,000 homes in the Gaza Strip, uprooting 16,000 people for the second time in their lives.

Profound injustice

In both Jerusalem incidents of Palestinian’s bulldozers, operators were immediately stopped with several bullets to their heads by a bypassing officer and a civilian.

Nissim was considered the most devoted and brave; certainly the most destructive operator. After the publication of his testemony—and in spite of it—the unit to which the man belongs received from the army commander an official citation for outstanding service. Not surprising from a system and an army that selects a drunken man on this mission of destruction!

In June of 2003, a military investigation by the Israel Defense Forces Judge Advocate’s Office concluded that the woman’s death was accidental. “The driver at no point saw or heard Corrie.”

An Israeli commission of inquiry investigated the massacre at Sabra and Shatilla and in February 1983 publicly released its findings: Ariel Sharon was responsible for the massacre. On 14 February 1983, he was relieved of his duties as defence minister, to come back to the political scene as prime minister several years later to be the saviour of Israel.

Daily crimes perpetrated by bulldozers go unheeded and unprotested; one can think of many, Israelis that regularly drive over homes and schools and necks of Palestinians and go unpunished. It only becomes terrorism when the perpetrator is a Palestinian or the victim is a Jew!

While Shin Bet, the Israel Security Agency, has yet to officially rule that the attacks were politically motivated, Israeli authorities are keen to crack down on East Jerusalem residents: Jerusalem witnesses the intensive presence of police and armed citizens, and officials expedite procedures that would authorize punitive measures, such as razing the perpetrator’s family home, expelling the families of Palestinians involved in attacks against Israelis and revoking the Israeli identity cards of their immediate relatives.

A Palestinian goes on a rampage on Israelis, is shot dead, labeled a terrorist and his entire family is punished while an Israeli soldier who shot a blindfolded, handcuffed, unarmed Palestinian at point-blank range goes free! Is there any wonder why people kill each other in this region?

The two bulldozer incidents follow an attack in West Jerusalem in which a Jerusalemite gunman killed eight students in a religious school in March. It seems that no acts of deterrence and punitive tools are effective in stopping someone who decides to give up his life in protest to the occupation. Profound injustice allows us to foresee more attacks.

Hussam and Ghassan may have followers; and there are no security measures or means to counter the Palestinian reaction to Israel’s exploitation of power, except by making peace and recognizing the national and human rights of the Palestinians to pave the way for a different future that reflects inclusion, tolerance and accommodation in which all the citizens of this land use their capacities, opportunities and resources, including their bulldozers, to build a better world.

Read More »Bulldozer terrorism it depends on whos on top and whos underneath

Eid message from the presidency to all muslims in south Africa

  • by

image 

The celebration of Eidul Fitr comes after fasting and sacrificing in the month of Ramadaan. It is the celebration of those who have purified and renewed themselves. Renewal is ever necessary for individuals and societies, and renewal is often best achieved following a period of sacrifice and hardship. The Muslim Community has shown a willingness to impose on themselves abstention from food and drink, but also from negative habits during Ramadaan.

It has been such purposeful faith that has allowed the Muslim community to become an important and integrated part of our nation.

South Africa has not designated Muslims equal to other citizens because we do Muslims a favor. They are equal citizens; enjoying both shared and unique rights, because they have earned them through centuries of suffering and resistance, as slaves and exile under colonialism and inferior citizens under apartheid.

On the day of Eidul Fitr, we too as a government renew our commitment to Muslims as equal, fellow citizens, living together in peace and harmony in a democratic South Africa

Eid Mubarak

HE Kgalema Motlanthe

President of the Republic of South Africa

Read More »Eid message from the presidency to all muslims in south Africa

Olmert Isarael must quit east jerusalem and golan

  • by

By Haaretz Service

Outgoing Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said in remarks published Monday that Israel would have to withdraw from East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights if it was serious about making peace with the Palestinians and Syria.

In an interview with the Yedioth Aharonoth daily, Olmert said that as a hard-line politician for decades he had not been prepared to look at reality in all of its depth.

"Ariel Sharon spoke about painful costs and refused to elaborate," Olmert told the daily. "I say, we have no choice but to elaborate. In the end of the day, we will have to withdraw from the most decisive areas of the territories. In exchange for the same territories left in our hands, we will have to give compensation in the form of territories within the State of Israel."

"I think we are very close to an agreement," Olmert added.

These comments were the clearest sign to date of Olmert’s willingness to meet key Palestinian demands in peace talks.

With regard to the Syria track, Olmert added that a future peace agreement required a pullout from the Golan Heights, an area under Israeli control since the 1967 Six-Day War.

"First and foremost, we must make a decision. I’d like to see if there is one serious person in the State of Israel who believes it is possible to make peace with the Syrians without eventually giving up the Golan Heights."

"It is true that an agreement with Syria comes with danger," he said. "Those who want to act with zero danger should move to Switzerland."

Yedioth Aharonoth noted that in this "legacy interview," published on the eve of the Jewish New Year, Olmert went further in making offers for peace than he ever did publicly when he was in active office and had greater power to see them carried out.

The interview was met with fierce criticism from politicians on both the right and the left.

MK Yuval Steinitz said the comments demonstrated the outgoing leader’s readiness "to ignore even the most crucial" of Israel’s needs.

"The prime minister’s concession the essential borders of defense is a gamble on the bone of existence, and the future of the State of Israel," Steinitz told Army Radio in response to Olmert’s comments.

"Ignoring the distance between rockets fired from afar and the enemy sitting on top of Jerusalem reveals how little he understands the basis of security," Steinitz added.

Former Meretz chairman Yossi Beilin criticized Olmert for having offered such concessions only on the eve of his departure from premiership.

"Olmert has committed the unforgivable sin of revealing his truce stance on Israel’s national interest just when he has nothing left to lose," said Beilin.

According to Western and Palestinian officials, Olmert has proposed in peace talks with the Palestinians an Israeli withdrawal from some 93 percent of the West Bank, plus all of the Gaza Strip, from which Israel pulled out in 2005.

The negotiations, which Olmert has vowed to continue until he leaves office when a new government is formed, have shown few signs of progress and both sides acknowledge chances are slim of meeting Washington’s target of a deal by the end of the year.

Olmert has also engaged Syria in indirect negotiations with Turkish mediation, but has not remarked publicly on the scope of an Israeli pullout from the Golan Heights.

Olmert has said repeatedly that Israel intends to keep major Jewish settlement blocs in the West Bank in any future peace deal with the Palestinians.

A peace agreement, Olmert has said, would mean Israel would have to compensate the Palestinians for the land it hopes to retain by "close to a 1-to-1 ratio."

In exchange for the settlement enclaves, Olmert has proposed about a 5 percent land swap giving the Palestinians a desert territory adjacent to the Gaza Strip, as well as land on which to build a transit corridor between Gaza and the West Bank.

He has so far put off negotiations on sharing Jerusalem and ruled out a so-called "right of return" for Palestinian refugees, a central Palestinian demand. On both issues, there is strong opposition in Israel to significant concessions.

Olmert, who has stepped down in the face of a possible criminal indictment in a corruption investigation, will remain caretaker prime minister until a new government is approved by parliament.

A week ago, President Shimon Peres asked Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni, now leader of Olmert’s centrist Kadima party, to try to put together a governing coalition within six weeks. Failure to do so would likely lead to a parliamentary election.

 

Read More »Olmert Isarael must quit east jerusalem and golan

Americas56failed poll

  • by

By  IOL Staff

CAIRO — America’s so-called "war on terror" has failed to weaken its prime target, Al-Qaeda, or win hearts and minds in countries on the frontline of its seven-year campaign, a BBC global poll revealed on Monday, September 29.

"Despite its overwhelming military power, America’s war against Al-Qaeda is widely seen as having achieved nothing better than a stalemate," said Steven Kull, director of the University of Maryland’s Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) who helped conduct the poll.

"Many believe that it has even strengthened Al-Qaeda."

In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, US President George W. Bush unleashed what he describes as a global war against terrorism, including two preemptive wars against Afghanistan and then Iraq without a UN mandate.

Seven years later, most people across the world believe his56has utterly failed to achieve its goals.

The survey of 24,000 people across 23 countries, conducted for the BBC World Service by the international polling firm GlobeScan together with PIPA, showed that only 22 percent of people believe Al-Qaeda has been weakened.

Nearly 30 percent thought the war had no effect and another 30 percent believed it had actually made Al-Qaeda stronger.

The poll showed that the overall verdict across the world appeared to be that the56had produced no winner.

"Asked who is winning ‘the conflict between Al-Qaeda and the US,’ the predominant view of those polled is that neither the US nor Al-Qaeda is winning with 15 countries holding this view."

The results showed that even Americans are skeptical.

Fifty-nine percent believe the war has either had no effect (26%) or has made Al-Qaeda stronger (33%).

"Fifty-six percent believe neither side is winning the conflict."

Losing Hearts, Minds

The global poll shows dominant negative views of the56in countries known as American allies in the campaign like France, Britain and Australia.

It also found that in two countries seen as being on the frontline of the conflict — Egypt and Pakistan — a majority of those polled had a positive opinion of Al-Qaeda.

"When asked "overall would you say your feelings about Al-Qaeda are positive, negative or mixed", some 60% of Egyptians said they had either a positive or mixed view," said the study.

"In Pakistan, where much of the battle against Al-Qaeda is being fought, just 19% said they had a negative view of Osama Bin Laden’s organization."

Analysts believe the findings should be a worrying signal to the US.

"The fact that so many people in Egypt and Pakistan have mixed or even positive views of Al-Qaeda is yet another indicator that the US56is not winning hearts and minds," said Doug Miller, chairman of GlobeScan.

The poll is not the first to indicate the failure of America’s war on terror.

A survey by the US Foreign Policy Magazine has showed the majority of leading US experts and former officials believe Washington is losing the war.

Last year, a report by Britain’s reputable Oxford Research Group concluded that the56has been a disaster and has been fueling support for Al-Qaeda and other extremists groups.

In its latest studies, RAND Corporation, a leading US think-tank working with Pentagon, said that the US should stop using the "war on terror" label and shift its strategy from the heavy military might to greater use of intelligence work.

Click on the link below to view the poll:

http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/pdf/sep08/BBCAlQaeda_Sep08_rpt.pdf

Read More »Americas56failed poll