Skip to content

Lawfare – Features

An open letter to president Obama

  • by

(source: michaelmoore.com)

Dear President Obama,

Do you really want to be the new "war president"? If you go to West Point tomorrow night (Tuesday, 8pm) and announce that you are increasing, rather than withdrawing, the troops in Afghanistan, you are the new war president. Pure and simple. And with that you will do the worst possible thing you could do — destroy the hopes and dreams so many millions have placed in you. With just one speech tomorrow night you will turn a multitude of young people who were the backbone of your campaign into disillusioned cynics. You will teach them what they’ve always heard is true — that all politicians are alike. I simply can’t believe you’re about to do what they say you are going to do. Please say it isn’t so.

Read More »An open letter to president Obama

One sided negotiation

  • by

By Aayesha Soni – Brixton

(source: BusinessDay – Published: 2010/11/24)

The latest turn of36regarding the Palestinian-Israeli peace talks has prompted this letter. The US and President Barack Obama are trying to fulfil the role of impartial mediator. However, I find it difficult to believe that the US really is the “man for the job”, with its obvious tendency to favour Israeli politics.

It would seem natural that the Palestinians are demanding a freeze in the building of Israeli settlements in the West Bank. One cannot expect them to enter into peace talks on the one hand, while on the other the land they are fighting for is being seized under the pretence of “natural expansion”.

To any logical mind this would seem preposterous. And yet, in order to attempt to get Israel to stop the building of illegal settlements so that peace talks may resume, the US has offered Israel a deal encompassing some rather unbelievable concessions.

It is as if the US is offering Israel a reward to stop actions that have already been deemed illegal by the United Nations and several other international bodies.

As reported by Reuters, this includes 20 F-35 stealth jets worth 3bn and a promise to use Washington’s veto in the United Nations Security Council to block anti-Israeli resolutions — essentially the deal would confirm the loyalty of the American veto.

With the supposed mediator having such an obvious inclination to a single party, and that party taking full advantage of the leverage it apparently wields, it is no wonder the peace talks have not seen success yet.

Read More »One sided negotiation

Swiss builds minaret in protest

  • by

(source: VOCfm Online/ Islam Online)

A Swiss businessman appalled by the recent blanket ban on the construction of mosque minarets in his country has build a mock minaret at his building near the western city of Lausanne in protest at the ban. "It was scandalous that the Swiss voted for the ban," Guillaume Morand, who owns a chain of shoe stores, told Agence France-Presse (AFP) on Thursday, December 10. "This is shameful."

pic

The businessman, who is not a Muslim, explained that the he had constructed the mock minaret to protest the ban and send a message of peace. More than 57 percent of Swiss voters backed on Sunday, November 29, a far-right call for a blanket ban on the construction of minarets, a surprise result to the government and Swiss Muslim. The Swiss People’s Party (SVP) — Switzerland’s biggest party — had forced a referendum under Swiss regulations on the issue after collecting 100,000 signatures within 18 months from eligible voters.
Read More »Swiss builds minaret in protest

Goldstones shameful u turn

  • by

By Ilan Pappe

(source: Electronic Intifada)

judge-richard-goldstone.jpg

“If I had known then what I know now, the Goldstone report would have been a different document.” Thus opens Judge Richard Goldstone’s much-discussed op-ed in The Washington Post. I have a strong feeling that the editor might have tampered with the text and that the original sentence ought to have read something like: “If I had known then that the report would turn me into a self-hating Jew in the eyes of my beloved Israel and my own Jewish community in South Africa, the Goldstone report would never have been written at all.” And if that wasn’t the original sentence, it is certainly the subtext of Goldstone’s article.

This shameful U-turn did not happen this week. It comes after more than a year and a half of a sustained campaign of intimidation and character assassination against the judge, a campaign whose like in the past destroyed mighty people such as US Senator William Fulbright who was shot down politically for his brave attempt to disclose AIPAC’s illegal dealings with the State of Israel.

Already In October 2009, Goldstone told CNN, “I’ve got a great love for Israel” and “I’ve worked for many Israeli causes and continue to do so” (Video: “Fareed Zakaria GPS,” 4 October 2009). Given the fact that at the time he made this declaration of love he did not have any new evidence, as he claims now, one may wonder how could this love could not be at least weakened by what he discovered when writing, along with other members of the UN commission, his original report.

But worse was to come and exactly a year ago, in April 2010, the campaign against him reached new heights, or rather, lows. It was led by the chairman of the South African Zionist Federation, Avrom Krengel, who tried to prevent Goldstone from participating in his grandson’s bar mitzvah in Johannesburg since “Goldstone caused irreparable damage to the Jewish people as a whole.”

The South African Zionist Federation threatened to picket outside the synagogue during the ceremony. Worse was the interference of South Africa’s Chief Rabbi, Warren Goldstein, who chastised Goldstone for “doing greater damage to the State of Israel.” Last February, Goldstone said that “Hamas perpetrated war crimes, but Israel did not,” in an interview that was not broadcast, according to a 3 April report the website of Israel’s Channel 2. It was not enough: the Israelis demanded much more.

Read More »Goldstones shameful u turn